<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: MySQL performance</title>
	<link>http://www.fabent.co.uk/blog/2007/06/25/mysql-performance/</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 02:01:40 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: arabxptyltd</title>
		<link>http://www.fabent.co.uk/blog/2007/06/25/mysql-performance/#comment-7475</link>
		<dc:creator>arabxptyltd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jun 2007 04:00:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.fabent.co.uk/blog/2007/06/25/mysql-performance/#comment-7475</guid>
		<description>You make a good point at "Literal current date is better than using the CURRENT_DATE() function because literals will use the query cache but functions won’t."

So much so I wrote about it for aggregation with Planet MySQL at http://blog.arabx.com.au/?p=749</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You make a good point at &#8220;Literal current date is better than using the CURRENT_DATE() function because literals will use the query cache but functions won’t.&#8221;</p>
<p>So much so I wrote about it for aggregation with Planet MySQL at <a href="http://blog.arabx.com.au/?p=749" rel="nofollow">http://blog.arabx.com.au/?p=749</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
